American Vegetable Grower American Vegetable Grower
american vegetable grower navigation Home News Veggie Bytes Awards Events Links Subscribe Marketing Kits Contact Us Meister Pro Meister Media Worldwide



American Vegetable Grower
  b o n u s  c o v e r a g e ← back
blank blank blank
 

 

American Vegetable Grower


 

Support Groups

Understanding FRAC code groups can help you maintain the effectiveness of valuable fungicide treatments.

By Andy Wyenandt and Nancy Maxwell

IN RECENT years a number of new fungicide chemistries have become commercially available for use in vegetable production to control important diseases. Many of these new chemistries have site-specific modes of action and target a single site in fungal growth and development. Because of this specificity, some chemistries have a high risk for fungicide resistance development.

spacer
How Resistance Develops
spacer
spacer UNDERSTANDING why and how a fungus develops resistance to a specific fungicide is important to understanding fungicide resistance management. For the fungus, it’s simply a matter of survival.

A fungal population, much like the human population, is made up of a number of individuals. One of these individuals may have a mutation that enables it to be completely resistant to a fungicide group or to tolerate a higher dose of a fungicide than the other “wildtype” individuals in the population. Because mutation is a chance event, this resistant individual could be present even before a product in this group is applied for the first time.

Initially the fungicide will be very effective because the population is almost entirely made up of sensitive individuals. However, the situation can change rapidly, especially if a fungicide resistance management program is not being used, because certain fungi are capable of reproducing asexually (clonally) and doing so several times during just one growing season. As those resistant individuals multiply, a much larger proportion of the pathogen population will be unaffected by that particular fungicide, and will eventually reach sufficient numbers to wreak havoc on your crop.
spacer
spacer

A few years ago industry personnel established the Fungicide Resistance Action Committee, or FRAC, to address fungicide resistance management. FRAC helps identify existing and potential resistance problems, develops resistance management guidelines, and in the process, stimulates collaboration among universities, government agencies, crop advisers, extension workers, distributors, and growers. Most importantly, this committee established what are known as FRAC codes for different fungicide chemistries. Fungicides with similar modes of action (MOA) are placed into the same FRAC code group.

Why is this so important? Fungicides with similar MOAs have the same affect on fungal growth and development, and overuse of high-risk fungicides with similar MOAs may lead to fungicide resistance development. One of the best ways to combat this problem is to alternate fungicide products with different modes of action. That’s where FRAC groups can help.

Let’s look at one FRAC group in particular, FRAC group 11, which includes the strobilurin (aka QoI) fungicides. Strobilurins control fungi by inhibiting a very specific part of fungal respiration. Fungicides in FRAC group 11 include Amistar or Quadris (azoxystrobin, Syngenta Crop Protection), Flint (trifloxystrobin, Bayer CropScience), and Cabrio (pyraclostrobin, BASF), among others. Each fungicide has a slightly different chemistry but similar modes of action. Thus, simply applying a FRAC group 11 fungicide one week and another FRAC group 11 fungicide the next to control an important disease such as cucurbit powdery mildew is not really different than applying the same fungicide both weeks.

Ultimately, as part of the “sensitive” fungal population controlled by FRAC group 11 fungicides is killed off, a new “resistant” population to the fungicide chemistry may be developing. All of this may be taking place before you realize it, and you will have spent a lot of money applying a fungicide (or group of fungicides) that are no longer effective in controlling the pathogen (see How Resistance Develops sidebar).

Look For The Label
To date, there are 43 numbered and three lettered FRAC group codes. Fungicide manufacturers recently have started placing these codes on the front of labels (see Figure 1). If not found on the front of the label, FRAC codes can be present in the resistance management section of the label or in your local commercial recommendations guide (Figure 2).

Figure 1
Figure 2
spacer FRAC codes often appear on the front of the
material label (top) or in the label’s resistance
management section (highlighted, bottom) .
spacer

Associated with the FRAC fungicide grouping system are important manufacturer restrictions for applying fungicides in a particular group, which should always be followed to help manage resistance development. Additionally, the label is the law. These restrictions include alternations, and tank-mixtures as well as limits on the total amount to be applied and the number of allowable applications per season.

Why should vegetable growers take the time to learn about and understand FRAC groups? Unfortunately, several economically important pathogens of vegetable crops already have developed resistance to key fungicide groups in the U.S., and this has been associated with poor control. For the widely used FRAC group 11 fungicides, resistance has been reported in the pathogens causing powdery mildew, downy mildew, and gummy stem blight/black rot in cucurbit crops. Another example is resistance to mefenoxam (FRAC group 4) in the pathogen causing Phytophthora blight, which results in devastating losses in pepper and cucurbit production throughout the country.

Over the next few months we will be looking more into fungicide chemistry, FRAC groups, and fungicide resistance management for vegetable crops. Until then, the next time you are out in your pesticide storage facility, have a look at your labels and determine which FRAC groups your more commonly used fungicides belong to.

Wyenandt is Extension Specialist in Vegetable Pathology and Maxwell is Field Researcher IV in Vegetable Pathology with the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Rutgers University. Direct comments or questions to
wyenandt@aesop.rutgers.edu

 

Mix And Match

The Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC) has established a series of FRAC codes for different fungicide chemistries. Fungicides with similar modes of action are placed into the same FRAC code group. By alternating products with different FRAC codes, growers can help avoid the development of fungicide resistance development.

To date, there are 43 numbered and 3 lettered FRAC groups. Most of the commonly used fungicides in vegetable production fall into just a few of these FRAC groupings. The table below lists FRAC codes for many of the most common vegetable fungicides, as well as resistance management guidelines.

The table can also be viewed in pdf format by clicking here

spacer FRAC Codes and Resistance Management Guidelines for
Commonly Used Fungicides in Commercial Vegetable Production
spacer Fungicide Active Ingredient(s) FRAC Code* Risk Management** Management Required Fungicide Resistance Management Guidelines*** spacer
spacer Sulfur Sulfur M1 L N Frac Code M fungicides are low risk, protectant fungicides; Tank mix with higher risk fungicides and use
in rotations with other
FRAC Codes
 
spacer Copper fixed copper(s) M2 L N  
spacer Mancozeb, Maneb, Dithane EBDC M3 L N  
spacer Captan Captan M4 L N  
  chlorothalonil chlorothalonil M5 L N  
spacer Topsin M thiophanate-methyl 1 H Y Tank mix, rotate  
  Nova, Procure, Tilt myclobutanil, triflumizole, propiconizole 3

M

Y Tank mix with FRAC Code M fungicides, rotate with other FRAC Codes  
spacer Ridomil Gold Copper mefenoxam + copper 4 + M1 H L Y Formulation reduces risk  
spacer Ridomil Gold Bravo mefenoxam + chlorothalonil 4 + M5 H L Y  
spacer Ridomil Gold, Ultra Flourish mefenoxam 4 H Y Resistance known  
spacer Endura boscalid 7 M Y Resistance known, tank
mix & rotate with other
FRAC Codes
 
spacer Switch cyprodinil + fludioxonil 9 + 12 M Y  
spacer Amistar / Quadris azoxystrobin 11 H Y High Risk, Tank mix with FRAC Code M fungicides;
Rotate with non-FRAC Code 11 fungicides. Follow
restrictions on label
 
spacer Cabrio pyraclostrobin 11 H Y  
spacer Flint trifloxystrobin 11 H Y  
spacer Pristine pyraclostrobin + boscalid 11 + 7 H Y  
spacer Reason fenamidone 11 H Y  
spacer Tanos fomoxadone + cymoxanil 11 + 27 M Y  
spacer Elevate fenhexamid 17 L – M Y Rotate/tank mix with other FRAC Codes  
  Ranman cyazofamid 21 M – H Y  
spacer Gavel zoxamide + mancozeb 22 + M3 L – M Y Rotate with other
FRAC Codes
 
spacer Curzate cymoxanil 27 L – M Y Rotate/tank mix with a FRAC Code M fungicide if required, rotate with other FRAC Codes  
spacer Previcur Flex propomocarb HCL 28 L – M Y  
spacer Alliete, Phosphonates fosetyl Al, phosphorous acids 33 L Y  
spacer Forum dimethomorph 40 L – M Y  
spacer
*FRAC Code: M = multi-site mode of action (MOA), numbered groups = fungicides with similar MOA
**Risk management: L = low risk, M = moderate risk, or H = high risk for fungicide resistance to develop
***See fungicide label for specific crops, rates, and instructions on use
 
spacer
Source: Dr. Andy Wyenandt & Nancy Maxwell, New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Rutgers University
 
spacer
Trade or Brand Names Disclaimer: The trade or brand names given herein are supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by the Rutgers Cooperative Extension is implied. Furthermore, in some instances the same compound may be sold under different names, which may vary as to label clearances.
 

 

 






© 2008 Meister Media Worldwide | Privacy Statement | Reprint Permissions